أَعُوذُ بِاللّٰهِ مِنَ الشَّيْطَانِ الرَّجِيمِ

بِسۡمِ ٱللهِ ٱلرَّحۡمَـٰنِ ٱلرَّحِيمِ

In the name of ALLAH, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

Don’t Negotiate with Dajjal By Alexander Dugin

In a new essay, the Russian philosopher Alexander Dugin Says Iran Cannot Bargain With the West. He argues that open talks with Washington are a trap, that escalation must be answered with escalation, and that Tehran gains nothing at the negotiating table.

The Russian philosopher Alexander Dugin has argued that Iran can reach no genuine peace with the United States, contending in a new essay that negotiating with the West is a trap and that the only effective response is mutual escalation.

Writing for Multipolar Press under the title “You Don’t Negotiate With Dajjal,” Dugin points to what he describes as the collapse of any Iran–US settlement: Washington, in his account, resumed its bombing of Iranian territory, while Tehran struck American military bases in Bahrain and once more closed the Strait of Hormuz. The talks were doomed from the outset, he argues, because — in a principle he draws from Shia metaphysics — there can be no compromise with Dajjal, the one-eyed false messiah and ultimate deceiver of Islamic eschatology, who embodies absolute evil.

‘Escalation must be mutual’

At the heart of Dugin’s argument is a doctrine he says applies equally to Iran’s confrontation with the West and to Russia’s own war: escalation must be mutual. When the enemy escalates, he writes, the other side must escalate in turn; only then can it shape the course of events. To do otherwise is to let the adversary escalate unilaterally on its own terms while one is reduced to passive reaction — a dynamic he characterises as a form of external control imposed during wartime. Merely delaying conflict and maintaining the appearance of negotiations, he contends, always works to the West’s advantage.

Dugin extends the same critique to Moscow, faulting Russia for what he sees as its failure to respond forcefully to Western involvement in the war against it, and questioning why his own country does not answer such pressure in kind.

Negotiations as an information weapon

Talks themselves are not the problem, in Dugin’s telling — publicity is. Negotiations may be conducted, he argues, but only in one’s own interest and never in the open; the moment they become public, they turn into an information weapon that, in his view, only the West knows how to wield, and always for its own ends. On this logic, he claims, even the mention of figures associated with backchannel diplomacy can sap the morale of soldiers at the front and dampen a nation’s resolve.

He applies the same reasoning to Iran. At the funeral of the martyred Leader Ayatollah Sayyed Ali Khamenei, Dugin notes, angry curses were directed at those associated with negotiating with the West — naming Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. He adds, however, that he does not consider them personally to blame, attributing the hostility instead to the logic of information warfare, whose rules he says the West sets and exploits unilaterally.

Dugin also claimed that, in the wake of the initial US and Israeli strikes on Iran’s leadership, the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps had moved against what he called a “sixth column” of internal enemies, suggesting that some such elements remained.

The essay, translated from the Russian, closes on Dugin’s central conviction: that for both Iran and Russia, the open negotiating table is not a path to peace but an instrument the West turns against those who agree to sit at it.

NOTE" The above taken from the link >>> https://www.purewilayah.com/p/you-dont-negotiate-with-dajjal-dugin

First and foremost, it must be borne in mind that Iran did not initiate this war; rather, the United States and the Zionist Jewish state of Israel jointly attacked Iran on February 28, 2026, and—with the very first strike—Targetted and killed many prominent high leaders and officials, including Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamnei. The offensive began with an attack on a children's school, resulting in approximately two hundred deaths.

The aggressors, the foremost fearsome military might of the history of USA along with the “invincible-IDF” of Israel have failed to achieve their ulterior motives and the weak and sanctioned for 47 years Iran has shown, not ut the “teeth” but has bitten selectively. The selective repulsive attack from Iran has surprised many geopolitical military experts and watchers. The Irans response towards Israel and US’s associates in the region has sent shock waves. Therefore every day that the United States fails to open the Strait of Hormuz marks a day of victory for Iran; thus, for five consecutive months, Iran has been achieving victory on a daily basis.

Israel's decision to step back from the conflict represents a victory for Iran. However, this is merely a ruse intended to reassure Arab populations that the conflict is not a war between Islam and Judaism. Consequently, the devastating retaliatory strikes Iran would launch against various types of American bases in response to any U.S. attack would signify an Iranian victory.

Over the past five months, Trump’s popularity among his own people has declined, while the popularity of the Iranian leadership has risen; this, too, is a victory for Iran. A war with Iran is viewed as the most unpopular war in American history. The majority of the American public does not support a war with Iran; this also constitutes a victory for Iran.

The fact that Russia, China, North Korea, Iraq, Yemen, Oman, and Hezbollah stand with Iran constitutes a victory for Iran. Gaining global respect and esteem is also a victory for Iran. The humiliation and disgrace faced by the United States on the global stage is likewise a victory for Iran. The recent recognition of Palestine by a dozen European countries also represents a victory for Iran.

Trump’s humiliation at the hands of Spain and Italy is also a victory for Iran. NATO’s refusal—for the first time—to join an American war is also a victory for Iran. The fact that American ground troops did not participate in an American war—for the first time—is also a victory for Iran. The failed raid by American commandos on Isfahan—the most disastrous operation in U.S. history—is also a victory for Iran. The relegation of the Abraham Accords to the dustbin of history is also a victory for Iran.

The United States, Israel, and the true protagonists—Zionist Jews—had themselves plunged into the war with covert objectives; they never desired peace, and the talk of peace was merely a ruse. Having suffered heavy setbacks, they staged a charade of negotiations to regroup their forces and hatch a new conspiracy against Iran. The war initiated during the holy month of Ramadan failed to achieve its goals; instead, Iran gained the upper hand, and hatred toward Jewish Israel spread across the Islamic world. Now, a new attack has been launched under a fresh pretext in an attempt to isolate Iran within the Islamic world.

Is the US-Israel war merely Iran’s resistance against the Dajjal (Antichrist)? The reality is that Israel’s Zionists are acting as the vanguard for the Dajjal, having pacified American religious groups with the hollow promise of Jesus Christ’s (peace be upon him) return. The Dajjal does not symbolize humanitarianism; rather, he is a metaphor for the darkest tyranny and barbaric destruction—manifestations of which are being unleashed with full intensity upon Gaza, Palestine. In this context, Iran is locked in combat with these Dajjal-like forces, and all powers arrayed against Iran must be characterized as forces of the Dajjal.